Politicians need to let the generals make the decisions right now.
If we are to come out of Iraq, we need to stabilize it first............our soldiers can and will do it.............we just need to unleash them and provide them with what they need to get the job done.
Side note:
As a Republican, I'm upset that we have let our military become so small, undermanaged, and under-equipped. Clinton assumed, along with many Americans, that after the Cold War, we could close down base after base.................hindsight is always 20/20, but we aren't as powerful as we used to be and our enemies have tried capitalizing on that (we were safe during the cold war simply by having such an amazing military, not necessarily by using it). I am in full support of Romney's promise to increase our armed forces by 100,000, and I hope for our security, we won't downsize again until this world is a different place.

P.S. Non-mormons aren't going to hell........I don't care what South Park says.




He's no Josh, that's for sure.........but as a Romney supporter, I find McFlugalson's cartoons refreshing.
Posted by Picasa

Today I received my 5th letter from Romney. The previous ones were generic letters he probably sent out to thousands, but still made me feel important in an odd "I'm contributing" kind of way. This last letter was actually a handwritten message on the back of a family photo. I've only contributed nickels and dimes to his campaign, but what a red-letter day. I imagine he's sent the pictures to people who haven't maxed-out on contributions.........I have to be honest, he'll probably get more money from me (I told my wife I wouldn't spend any more though......so I'll have to sacrifice junkfood for a month or something). Is there another presidential candidate out there who would take the time to do that?

I noticed there's no signature on the above picture. It was created by Josh Ferrin, an up-and-coming illustrator/author, who also contributes to this blog.

I've been quiet for a while, and I know you missed me. I'll try to balance out this blog a little more over the weekend.

Like the rest of the country, Monday's events were hard hitting for me. I didn't know a soul at the campus but it still feels so personal. To make things worse, it was my brothers birthday, another reminder of how tragic life can be. I can't even allow myself to comprehend loss on that scale, it is just difficult to wrap my mind around.

I wish we had answers, and pundits are already trying to find them and, in the process, turning a tragedy into a political opportunity. They see a tragedy and use it for an opportunity to spout the party line on gun control. Sad.

Even more sad is what I read on CNN today. 180 people senselessly massacred across Iraq in a series of attacks. It's interesting because I know tomorrow morning there will be few, if any, newspapers that put that news on their front pages. I can't pretend to understand why, but I think it has something to do with our personal detachment (us as a country- not personally) from the worsening situation over there. If 32 people is a tragedy, what is 180 people, and further, why don't we notice it anymore? I am afraid that attacks like this are no longer unexpected but it is no less a tragedy. Everyday children in Iraq are made into orphans, it's just sickening, and it breaks my heart that it is getting worse.

This isn't the most uplifting of posts, sorry. It's just stuff that's been on my mind. James, you should post something uplifting to compensate for my depressing stuff.

Probably need a laugh.


What would have happened if someone was armed when the mass-murderer went through VT?
By taking away the 2nd ammendment, would we be arming the vicious and disarming defenders? The bad guys will have guns regardless.......banning guns just disarms the law-abiding.
Hypothetically speaking, and we are able to remove the world of guns.....what role would bombs, blades, poisons, noxious gases, and other weaponry play?
It is impossible to eradicate guns.........
I agree that regulations need to be made.........registering for guns is a good thing--we need to know who owns guns and their history with the law. Also, people need to go through educational courses to avoid improper use of firearms.
I wonder if this is another issue we can relate to border control.......how many guns are smuggled into our country?


"Harry Reid, the Senate's top Democrat, says he's seen astounding and compelling numbers indicating Democrats will pick up Senate seats in '08 because of the war."----CNN
We have American soldiers dying everyday for something they believe in and our Senate Majority leader is concerned about votes. It's a good thing Reid isn't a soldier........he's nothing more than a deserter from his half-&$$ vote to go to Iraq in the first place.

Just watched this..................Josh, you probably hate Fox news--hope I'm not torturing you. I was really entertained.
Other issue:
What kind of crazy world do we live in when 32 lives are lost mindlessly? Gone........just like that. (During the bloodliest month in Iraq, December, 112 soldiers died). I think about whackos all of the time.......especially when I go hometeaching in bad neighborhoods. I think about my family too, of course. I've been putting serious thoughts in purchasing a firearm. I sometimes wonder what kind of affect the army has had on me.......I'm capable of killing an assailant without the slightest remorse.......words cannot express the anger that wells up inside when I think of someone removing me from my family. That's probably where a lot of my issues with the Middle East stems. There are radical jihadists who persistently seek to destroy our nation and kill our families.....I hope we get them first. I've probably been too open with this paragraph.......just tell me I'm psycho......I'll probably agree with you.

Hypocrites

This is late in coming..........but freedom of speech takes another wrong turn as we see Imus taken off the airwaves.
"Greek Homos" (Sharpton) and "Hymies" (Jackson) comes to mind. Who's next to be silenced? My vote is for Al Sharpton.
Here's some interesting thoughts:
If Imus was a conservative instead of a liberal would he have been fired? I'm not so sure..........the liberals/msm probably would want that conservative to stay disgorging garbage to nosh the notion that conservatives are racists. Just a theory (a weak one at that....... but just for the sake of argument).
How will this effect politics? The radio is full of Becks, Limbaughs, and Hannitys........? Is Howard Stern the only liberal left..........I guess there's Sharpton--who in my estimation is the biggest racist of them all.
Does anyone else get tired of the fact, that any incident involving a black person/s, Jackson and Sharpton are the first people there absorbing the spotlight? Whether it's a murderer getting the death penalty (the founder of the crypts), a black man getting shot in NYC (one of the cops was black himself), or OJ Simpson......geez--I'm just getting started............I get tired of them making racial issues out of everything............granted--the Imus comment was a nasty racist comment, but I think Sharpton blew it up, was unforgiving, and self-promoting.
I am glad that people were outraged by Imus's mistake.......I'd be worried if America wasn't. But isn't that what it's all about? Even though Imus didn't intend for this, he has promoted argument and discussion regarding racism.........I fail to recognize the benefits of shutting him up.


"All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort of a potential savior that might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said. "In a lot of ways it's about caution in assigning all these inflated expectations on one individual, and expecting them to change something that many hands have shaped."

Does this offend anyone? It doesn't offend me.....I've been annoyed with Obama's unsubstantiated star status, but I do feel sorry for him and the expectations placed on him by his followers (especially since we skeptics haven't seen anything he's done give his proclamations credence).


This story is funny. It not only was done by the Boston Globe, but done by a liberal journalist by the name of Scott. I've always had some sort of respect for Scott--partly because he always replies to my emails, but I am blown away that for once--the Globe does something that avoids placing Mitt on the Dark Side.

I think so.



Newt Gingrich and Garrison Keillor

I have serious problems with Republicans who deny the impact we have on our environment. But I have just as many issues with Democrats who want to stifle growth.

We need to be innovative, embrace new technologies and science, and give entrepeneurs incentives.

Saving the environment can have many economic advantages.........especially if WE lead the innovative movement for alternate fuels, transportation, and energy consumption. Imagine the jobs and money created from using our own fuel resources (ethanol, methane, or electricity sans fuel), making our own (and for the world) environment-friendly vehicles (hybrids, fuel-cells, or ethanol engines), and etc. There is so much growth and money to be made.........

I am anxiously awaiting the day we stop buying oil from people who hate us, the government isn't controlled by powerful oil corporations, and we Americans buy into the system--by that, I mean we need to be more pro-active (buying a compact hybrid instead of buying a Hummer could be a nice start).

Check out this debate:

I fail to recognize Kerry's point........besides informing us that Newt has stated that their is insufficient evidence of significant climate change due to human causation.


The New York times has been pretty annoying this week. They made sure to point out (along with Good Morning America) that 15% of Romney's money comes from Utah.
That's fine, 'cause that's the truth. But you Take 15% from 23 million and that is still more than any Republican.
They seem to forget that Mitt saved the Olympics in Utah.......one would expect more name recognition there even if he wasn't LDS.
I have yet to see newspapers making a big deal about how many blacks support Obama, how many women support Clinton, and how many folks in Hollywood support the both of them.
NYT is trying to discredit Romney's money........what is a man who is down in the polls (now #1 in New Hampshire though) and has little name recognition supposed to do? Deliberately try to make less money so that his funds are respectable??????? I give kudos to Romney with dealing with the hand he is dealt with and being extremely innovative in his campaign.
Here is today's article on Romney.......the title alone is slanderous......the content is almost fair, but too me it's negative and biased. Please tell me what you think of this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/06/us/politics/06romney.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2



It's not so much that he's pro-choice......but he expects me to pay for aborted babies. I don't care if the woman is poor..........if she's too poor to have an abortion, I bet she has medicaid and can give up her unwanted mistake for adoption. Besides, the way things are now--any woman can have a free pregnancy--she just has to refuse to pay the medical bill and Uncle Sam will eventually pick it up.

I understand that abortion is a constitutional right, but to have me pay for them infuriates me. http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/



I guess the Queen of Bush Slander is just doing her patriotic duty presenting her own foreign policy out there in friendly Syria.

Thanks Nancy for fulfilling your promise to reach out across the aisle to help better unify our nation.

What is she doing?????????

Dear liberals,

feel free to bash our president, the U.S., the soldiers, your republican parents.....but have the courtesy to do it within our borders. After all, this is a time of war......we don't need to be wearing our weaknesses out on our sleeves. Man, wouldn't it be great if unity wasn't a weakness anymore?

Thank you, James McCann


As much fun it is to rail on politics, I realized that it is going to be a long haul until the election next year. Both Romney and Clinton have raised absurd amounts of money which doesn't portend well.

Folks, it's gonna get ugly. Real ugly.

Can we call him Moneybags Mitt now?

For those who respect true musical talent.......enjoy!


 

Copyright 2007| No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.