A recent story was interesting enough for me to pull myself out of blogger cold-storage and post something.
I like to think I am at least semi-literate. I might kid myself into thinking that I am halfway intelligent. But at least I can pronounce Sarkozy without a phonetic guide. And I didn't even attend an Ivy-league school, nor am I the leader of the free world.
How embarrassing.
By the way. This is post #100.
He doesn't understand that soldiers are real people.
He doesn't understand the difference between friend and foe.
He's clumsy discussing nuclear warfare.
He doesn't understand geography.
Our military is having success in Iraq......what does Obama want to do? Take them out of course.........no, not home necessarily, but to Pakistan, a nation of 170 million muslims who would make Iraq look like a walk in the park. Obama would successfully crush the morale of our armed forces more than the Dems already have.
Pakistan is working with us. Instead of threatening our allies, why can't he promise support? I appreciate Mitt Romney's comments stating that Obama wants to have tea with our enemies and blow up our friends, going from Jane Fonda to Dr. Strangelove in one week.
When asked about using nucs....Obama was absolutely clumsy in stating his policy.....it was like he never even thought about it before (see "Obama the Orator" below). How can anybody want this guy as CIC? Honestly?
Does Obama have a clue about the importance of Pakistan? How does he think we get supplies to our armed forces in Afghanistan? Through Iran......a teleporter perhaps......FedEx?
Madame Hillary has never looked so good.
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday he would not use nuclear weapons «in any circumstance.«I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,» Obama said, with a pause, «involving civilians.» Then he quickly added, «Let me scratch that. There's been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That's not on the table.
As Charles Mitchell from EFM (Evangelicals for Mitt) said..........."huh?"
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/07/19/romney_sharpens_appeal_to_conservatives/
Romney is definatley not afraid to take on the leading Dems.
Just notice how scattered Obama's comments are compared to Romney's precise and clear answer and stance on this issue.
Must be good to have a clue...
This is what the National Journal had to say about the state of things:
They are putting Thompson behind Mitt for good reason. And Mitt is tied with Rudy for good reason.
The rankings are not consistent with the polls........because the truth of the matter is Mitt's a brilliant strategist with charisma. He is someone who will fight big government, big spending, and will fight for family values.......that message is connecting with a lot of people.
While the video lacks a plan, I'm pleased that my candidate is the first to put out an ad addressing the moral decline of our nation..........Mitt is a true family man who has our children's well-being as a concern.
It's been a while, but I thought I'd share this story with you guys. It looks like Romney is shaping up to be a flash in the pan, as expected. A shocking amount of Republicans could care less for all of the front runners and put Mitt at the bottom of the list. You can read the story here.
To make matters worse, an actor who hasn't officially announced that he his running has pulled WAY ahead of the stormin' Mormon. I guess deep pockets and perfect hair can only get you so far.